Article 360 of Indian Constitution

Introduction


  • The Indian Constitution, adopted on January 26, 1950, is the supreme law of India. It lays down the framework that defines the political principles, establishes the structure, procedures, powers, and duties of the government institutions, and sets out the fundamental rights, directive principles, and responsibilities of citizens. One crucial provision within the Indian Constitution is Article 360, which deals with the proclamation of financial emergency. In this article, we will explore the various aspects of Article 360 and its implications.

Understanding Article 360


Article 360 of Indian Constitution empowers the President of India to declare a financial emergency in the country if they believe the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is at risk. This provision allows the government to take extraordinary measures to safeguard the financial interests of the nation.


Article Number Name of the Article Type of Emergency Purpose Authority Scope Duration
Article 352 National Emergency Proclamation Declared in the event of a threat to the nation’s security due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. President of India Can be imposed on the entire nation or specific parts Can be extended indefinitely with the approval of Parliament
Article 356 President’s Rule State Emergency Imposed when there is a failure in the constitutional machinery of a state, leading to the breakdown of governance. President of India Applied to a specific state Initially for six months, extendable with Parliament’s approval
Article 360 Financial Emergency Proclamation Declared in case of a threat to the financial stability or credit of India or any part of its territory. President of India Can be imposed on the entire nation or specific parts Initially for two months, extendable up to three years with Parliament’s approval

Proclamation of Financial Emergency


  • A financial emergency can be proclaimed if the President is satisfied with the existence of circumstances that endanger the financial stability or credit of India. The President, upon the recommendation of the Union Cabinet, issues a proclamation, which must be approved by both houses of Parliament within two months.

Effects and Implications of Financial Emergency


Economic instability

  • A financial emergency can lead to significant economic instability. It can result in a decline in GDP growth, increased unemployment rates, and reduced business investments. This instability can have a ripple effect on various sectors of the economy.

Reduced consumer spending

  • During a financial emergency, people tend to tighten their belts and reduce discretionary spending. This decrease in consumer spending can have a negative impact on businesses, particularly those in the retail and hospitality sectors, leading to decreased revenues and potential layoffs.

Increased government borrowing

  • In order to address the financial emergency, governments may resort to increased borrowing to finance stimulus packages and support critical sectors of the economy. This can lead to higher national debt levels and potentially result in future tax increases or spending cuts.

Stock market volatility

  • Financial emergencies often lead to heightened volatility in the stock market. Investors become uncertain about the future and may sell off stocks, leading to significant market fluctuations. This volatility can impact individual investors, pension funds, and institutional investors.

Banking system stress

  • A financial emergency can put strain on the banking system. If individuals and businesses face difficulties in repaying loans, banks may experience an increase in non-performing loans. This can erode their capital base and potentially lead to a credit crunch, making it harder for businesses and individuals to access credit.

Currency devaluation

  • In some cases, a financial emergency can lead to a devaluation of the national currency. This can occur due to a loss of investor confidence, capital flight, or a balance of payment crisis. Currency devaluation can increase the cost of imports, leading to higher inflation rates and reduced purchasing power for citizens.

Social and political unrest

  • Financial emergencies can result in social and political unrest as people experience financial hardship and frustration. Protests, strikes, and civil unrest may occur as a response to economic difficulties. Governments may face challenges in maintaining social stability and may need to implement measures to address the grievances of the population.

Long-term implications

  • The effects of a financial emergency can be long-lasting. Even after the immediate crisis is resolved, the economy may take time to recover fully. The long-term implications can include higher levels of public debt, reduced investor confidence, decreased foreign direct investment, and potential changes in government policies and regulations.

The Role of the President on Financial Emergency


  • When a financial emergency is declared, the President has the authority to issue directions to the state governments regarding financial matters. This includes the power to reduce or suspend the allocation of financial resources to states and to issue orders for the reduction of salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving in the Union government, including judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
  • The President can also direct the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to adopt certain policies and measures to restore financial stability. These policies may include regulating the flow of credit to different sectors of the economy, controlling the functioning of financial institutions, and imposing restrictions on currency transactions.
  • Furthermore, during a financial emergency, the President can authorize the central government to assume control over the financial affairs of the states. This allows the central government to exercise direct control and supervision over state financial matters.
  • It is important to note that the declaration of a financial emergency is a rare occurrence in India, and it has only been invoked once in the history of the country, during the year 1991. The decision to declare a financial emergency is made by the President on the advice of the Union Cabinet, and it must be approved by both houses of Parliament within two months.
  • Overall, the role of the President during a financial emergency is to exercise executive authority and take necessary measures to restore financial stability and protect the economic interests of the country. The President acts upon the advice of the Union Cabinet and operates within the constitutional framework to address the financial crisis.

State of Financial Emergency vs. National Emergency


  • In India, the terms “Financial Emergency” and “National Emergency” refer to two different constitutional provisions that grant special powers to the central government in times of crisis. Here’s an explanation of both:

Financial Emergency

  • A Financial Emergency in India can be declared under Article 360 of the Indian Constitution. It empowers the President to proclaim a state of Financial Emergency if they believe the financial stability or credit of India or any part of its territory is threatened. The declaration must be supported by a formal proclamation from the President.
  • During a Financial Emergency, the central government assumes control over the financial affairs of the country or the affected states. It allows the government to issue directions to states regarding financial matters, reduce salaries and allowances of public servants, regulate trade and commerce, and take other necessary steps to restore financial stability.
  • However, since the enactment of the Indian Constitution in 1950, a Financial Emergency has never been declared in India.

National Emergency

  • A National Emergency, also known as “State of Emergency,” can be declared under Article 352 of the Indian Constitution. It allows the President to proclaim a state of emergency in the whole of India or in specific parts of the country if there is a threat to the security of India due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.
  • During a National Emergency, the central government acquires sweeping powers to take necessary measures to address the crisis effectively. The government can suspend fundamental rights, issue ordinances with the force of law, regulate or prohibit the functioning of state governments, and exercise other powers deemed essential to restore normalcy.
  • India has witnessed three instances of National Emergency. The first occurred in 1962 during the Sino-Indian war, the second in 1971 during the Indo-Pak war, and the third in 1975, known as the “Emergency,” when it was declared due to internal political unrest.
  • To conclude, a Financial Emergency in India relates to financial stability and credit threats, whereas a National Emergency pertains to threats to the security of India due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.

Suspension of Financial Provisions


  • During a financial emergency, the President can suspend the operation of financial provisions in the Constitution, except those relating to the distribution of revenues between the Union and the States. This gives the central government the authority to take necessary steps to address the financial crisis effectively.

Criticism and Controversy


  • The financial emergency in India has been a subject of criticism and controversy. When a financial emergency is declared, the central government gains extensive powers to regulate the financial affairs of the state governments. Here are some key criticisms and controversies surrounding the financial emergency in India:

Abuse of Power

  • One major criticism is that the central government may abuse its powers under the financial emergency provision to target political opponents or undermine the autonomy of state governments. This raises concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and the concentration of power in the hands of the central government.

Curtailing State Autonomy

  • Critics argue that the financial emergency provision gives the central government excessive control over state finances, effectively curtailing the autonomy of state governments. This undermines the federal structure of India’s governance and can lead to a centralization of power.

Impact on Federalism

  • The financial emergency provision is seen by some as a threat to the federal structure of India. It is argued that the central government can misuse this provision to bypass state governments and impose its policies without their consent. This creates tensions between the center and the states, potentially undermining cooperative federalism.

Economic Disruptions

  • During a financial emergency, the central government can take measures to regulate trade, commerce, and financial activities. However, such measures can disrupt economic activities, leading to economic instability and negatively affecting businesses, investors, and the overall economy. Critics argue that the potential economic fallout from a financial emergency outweighs any short-term benefits.

Constitutional Concerns

  • Some legal experts argue that the financial emergency provision itself is in conflict with the spirit of the Indian Constitution. They contend that it goes against the principles of federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution. Critics believe that the provision should be reevaluated or modified to align with constitutional principles.

Lack of Accountability

  • Critics also raise concerns about the lack of accountability and oversight during a financial emergency. The central government’s increased powers may lead to a decrease in transparency and the possibility of misuse of funds, with limited avenues for scrutiny or redress.

Impact on Investor Confidence

  • The declaration of a financial emergency can create uncertainty and negatively impact investor confidence. The perception of a country’s financial stability and governance can be affected, leading to a decrease in investments, both domestic and foreign.

Legal Safeguards and Judicial Review


  • The Indian Constitution ensures that the proclamation of a financial emergency is not misused. Any individual aggrieved by the proclamation can approach the judiciary for redressal. The Supreme Court acts as the ultimate guardian of the Constitution and has the power to review and strike down any arbitrary or unconstitutional actions.

Repealing a Proclamation of Financial Emergency


  • A proclamation of financial emergency can be revoked by the President when they are satisfied that the circumstances that necessitated the emergency have ceased to exist. The revocation must also be approved by both houses of Parliament within a specific timeframe.

Conclusion


  • Article 360 of the Indian Constitution serves as an important provision to address financial crises that may threaten the stability and credit of India. It grants the President the authority to declare a financial emergency and take necessary measures to restore stability. However, the provision’s potential for misuse and its impact on the federal structure of the country have been subjects of criticism.
  • As with any constitutional provision, it is crucial to strike a balance between granting necessary powers to address emergencies and ensuring adequate safeguards against misuse. The sparing use of Article 360 throughout India’s history is a testament to the resilience and strength of the country’s financial systems.
Share this: