Article 352 of Indian Constitution: An Overview of Emergency Provisions

Introduction

  • Article 352 of Indian Constitution pertains to the declaration of a National Emergency in India. It is part of Part XVIII, which deals with “Emergency Provisions.” The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, is a comprehensive document that provides the framework for governing the country. Among its various provisions, Article 352 of Indian Constitution deals with the proclamation of emergencies. This article explores the significance, conditions, and consequences of invoking Article 352, shedding light on the extraordinary powers granted to the government during emergency situations.

Difference between Article 352, Article 356 and Article 360

Article Number Name of the Article Type of Emergency Purpose Authority Scope Duration
Article 352 National Emergency Proclamation  Declared in the event of a threat to the nation’s security due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. President of India Can be imposed on the entire nation or specific parts Can be extended indefinitely with the approval of Parliament
Article 356 President’s Rule State Emergency Imposed when there is a failure in the constitutional machinery of a state, leading to the breakdown of governance. President of India Applied to a specific state Initially for six months, extendable with Parliament’s approval
Article 360 Financial Emergency Proclamation Declared in case of a threat to the financial stability or credit of India or any part of its territory. President of India Can be imposed on the entire nation or specific parts Initially for two months, extendable up to three years with Parliament’s approval

Understanding the Importance of Article 352

  • Article 352 of Indian Constitution is an important provision that deals with the proclamation of a state of emergency. The President of India is empowered to declare a state of emergency in the nation if they are convinced that the security of India, or any portion of it, is under threat due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.
  • The importance of Article 352 of Indian Constitution lies in its role in safeguarding the sovereignty, integrity, and security of the nation during times of crisis. When an emergency is proclaimed under this article, the normal functioning of the democratic system is temporarily suspended, and the government is granted additional powers to deal with the situation effectively.
  • Overall, Article 352 plays a crucial role in ensuring the security and stability of India during times of crisis, but its exercise must be balanced with the protection of individual rights and democratic values.

Conditions for the Proclamation of Emergency

  • In India, the conditions for the proclamation of a national emergency are outlined in Article 352 of the Constitution. According to the Constitution, a national emergency can be declared if the security of India or any part of its territory is threatened by war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. The decision to declare a national emergency is made by the President of India, who acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers.

The President can declare a national emergency if he/she is satisfied that there is an imminent danger to the security of India due to any of the following reasons:

War:

  • If India is engaged in an armed conflict with another country, or if a war-like situation has arisen, the President can declare a national emergency. This includes situations where India’s sovereignty or integrity is threatened by an external force.

External Aggression:

  • If there is an armed attack on India by another country, or if there is a threat of such an attack, the President can proclaim a national emergency. This provision is aimed at protecting the nation from external aggression.

Armed Rebellion:

  • If there is an armed rebellion or insurgency within the territory of India, posing a threat to the country’s security and law and order, the President can declare a national emergency. This provision empowers the government to deal with internal disturbances that threaten the stability of the nation.
  • The approval of both houses of Parliament is required within one month of issuing a proclamation of a national emergency. If approved, the emergency remains in force for a period of six months. However, it can be extended for an unlimited number of six-month terms with the approval of Parliament.
  • During a national emergency, the central government gains additional powers to deal with the situation. Fundamental rights of citizens can be suspended or restricted, and the central government can take control of the states and their administration. However, certain fundamental rights, such as the right to life and personal liberty, cannot be suspended even during an emergency.

Legislative Powers During an Emergency

  • During a national emergency, the central government can make laws on any subject, including matters within the jurisdiction of the states. The executive authority of the Union extends to giving directions to states on matters that fall within the state’s executive power. In other words, the central government can bypass the usual legislative procedures and directly issue orders to the states.

Suspension of Fundamental Rights

  • During a national emergency, the President has the power to suspend certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. However, not all fundamental rights can be suspended. The rights to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and the right to protection against arrest and detention in certain cases (Article 22) cannot be suspended even during an emergency.
  • Other fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech and expression (Article 19), freedom of assembly (Article 19), freedom to move freely throughout the territory of India (Article 19), and the right to constitutional remedies (Article 32), can be suspended during a national emergency. The President can also suspend the enforcement of any other constitutional provisions dealing with fundamental rights.
  • It is important to note that the suspension of fundamental rights during a national emergency is temporary and must be approved by both houses of Parliament within one month. If the proclamation of emergency is not approved by Parliament, the suspension of fundamental rights ceases to operate. Additionally, any law passed during the emergency that infringes upon fundamental rights ceases to have effect after six months from the date the emergency ends, unless approved by Parliament.
  • The power to suspend fundamental rights during a national emergency is a significant measure aimed at ensuring the security and integrity of the country. However, it is subject to constitutional safeguards and oversight to prevent misuse and protect the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Judicial Review

  • Judicial review refers to the power of the courts to examine and assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions. In India, the power of judicial review is enshrined in the Constitution under Article 13, which declares that any law inconsistent with the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution is void.
  • The National Emergency provisions in India are outlined in Article 352 of Indian Constitution. According to this article, the President of India has the power to proclaim a state of emergency if he/she is satisfied that the security of India or any part thereof is threatened by war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. During a National Emergency, the Central Government gains additional powers to govern the country.
  • However, the power to proclaim a National Emergency is not absolute and is subject to judicial review. The Supreme Court of India has the authority to examine the validity of the proclamation of emergency and the actions taken by the government during the emergency period.
  • The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in interpreting and reviewing the National Emergency provisions in India. In the landmark case of ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976), also known as the Habeas Corpus case, the Supreme Court initially held that during a National Emergency, the right to life and personal liberty, guaranteed under Article 21, could be suspended. This decision was widely criticized for undermining fundamental rights.
  • However, in subsequent years, the Supreme Court adopted a more expansive approach towards judicial review of emergency powers. In the case of Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980), the court declared that the power to proclaim an emergency is not absolute and can be reviewed by the judiciary. The court held that the essential features of the Constitution, including the basic structure and fundamental rights, cannot be abrogated even during an emergency.
  • Since then, the Supreme Court has consistently asserted its authority to review emergency proclamations and actions taken by the government during emergency periods. The court has emphasized the importance of preserving the basic structure of the Constitution and ensuring that fundamental rights are not violated even during emergencies.

Duration and Revocation of Emergency

  • In India, a national emergency can be declared under Article 352 of Indian Constitution in situations of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. The duration and revocation of a national emergency in India are governed by specific procedures outlined in the Constitution.
  • The President of India has the authority to declare a national emergency upon receiving a written recommendation from the Cabinet. The declaration must be based on a genuine threat to the security of the country or a part thereof. Once the President proclaims a national emergency, it must be approved by both houses of Parliament within one month.
  • The initial duration of a national emergency is limited to six months. However, it can be extended indefinitely with the approval of Parliament. If the Lok Sabha (the lower house) is dissolved during the emergency period, the Rajya Sabha (the upper house) must approve the extension within thirty days after the new Lok Sabha is convened.
  • The revocation of a national emergency is dependent on the President’s discretion. The President can revoke the emergency at any time if they believe that the situation that led to its proclamation has improved or no longer exists. Additionally, the emergency automatically ceases to operate if it is not approved by Parliament within the initial one-month period or if Parliament rejects its extension.

Accountability and Safeguards

  • In India, the declaration of a national emergency is a serious matter that grants the government additional powers to address exceptional situations that threaten the security and integrity of the nation. Accountability and safeguards play a crucial role in ensuring that these emergency powers are not misused and that the fundamental rights of citizens are protected. Let’s discuss the accountability and safeguards associated with a national emergency in India.

Constitutional Provisions:

  • The accountability of the government during a national emergency is primarily governed by the Indian Constitution. Articles 352 to 360 of the Constitution deal with emergency provisions, specifying the circumstances under which an emergency can be declared and the powers available to the government.

Parliamentary Oversight:

  • The President of India has the authority to proclaim a national emergency, but it must be approved by both houses of Parliament within one month. The emergency proclamation can be revoked or extended by Parliament through a resolution. This parliamentary oversight ensures that the government’s decision to declare an emergency is subject to scrutiny and debate.

Fundamental Rights Suspension:

  • During a national emergency, certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution can be suspended or limited. However, the Constitution explicitly states that the rights to life and personal liberty cannot be suspended. Any restriction on fundamental rights must be reasonable and in line with the principles of proportionality.

Fundamental Rights Protection:

  • Even during a national emergency, some fundamental rights remain non-derogable, meaning they cannot be suspended under any circumstances. These include the right to protection from arrest and detention, except under specific conditions, the right to access to courts, and the right to protection from being compelled to be a witness against oneself.

Media Freedom:

  • Although the government may impose certain restrictions on the freedom of the press during an emergency, the judiciary closely monitors any curtailment of media freedom. It ensures that the right to freedom of speech and expression is not unduly infringed upon and that the media can still perform its role as the fourth estate, holding the government accountable.

These accountability measures and safeguards are in place to protect the rights and liberties of Indian citizens during a national emergency. They ensure that the government’s exercise of emergency powers is subject to checks and balances, preventing any misuse or abuse of authority.

Conclusion

  • Article 352 of Indian Constitution provides the government with extraordinary powers to tackle crises that threaten the nation’s security or constitutional machinery. While these emergency provisions are essential for safeguarding the country’s interests, it is equally important to ensure accountability, transparency, and the protection of individual rights. Striking the right balance between security and civil liberties remains a crucial challenge in the effective implementation of emergency provisions.

Article 360 of Indian Constitution

Uniform Civil Code UPSC

Central Administrative Tribunal

Constitution of India

Share this: