Article 226 of the Indian Constitution


  • Article 226 of the Indian Constitution is a significant provision that empowers the High Courts of India to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights and other legal remedies.
  • This article plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice in the country.
  • In this article, we will explore the various aspects of Article 226, its historical background, scope, and its importance in the Indian legal system.

Understanding Article 226

Overview of Article 226

  • Article 226 is a constitutional provision that grants extraordinary powers to the High Courts of India.
  • It allows them to issue writs, orders, and directions to any authority, government, or person within their jurisdiction, for the enforcement of fundamental rights and other legal rights.
  • In essence, it serves as a constitutional guarantee of justice to citizens.
  • Article 226(1) grants every High Court in India the authority to issue directions, orders, or specific legal documents known as writs. These writs can be directed towards any person, authority, or even a government entity within the High Court’s jurisdiction. High Courts can use these powers to ensure the protection of fundamental rights as outlined in Part III of the Constitution and for addressing various other legal matters.
  • Article 226(2) grants the High Courts the power to issue orders, instructions, and writs to government authorities or individuals, even when they are located outside the court’s local jurisdiction, as long as the cause of action is partly or wholly within the court’s local jurisdiction, regardless of whether the government authority or individual resides within that territory.
  • Article 226(3) stipulates that when an interim order in the form of an injunction or a stay is issued against the respondent under Article 226 without:
  1. Providing the respondent with a copy of the petition and any relevant evidence.
  2. Providing the respondent with an opportunity to be heard.
  • The High Court must make a decision on the application within two weeks of receiving the application or within two weeks of the date on which the other party received the application, whichever is later. If the application is not disposed of within this timeframe, the interim order shall be revoked upon the expiration of that period. In case the High Court is closed on the last day of that period, the interim order shall be revoked before the expiration of the next day on which the High Court is open.
  • Article 226(4) does not limit the jurisdiction conferred upon High Courts by Article 226, and it does not prevent the Supreme Court from exercising its authority under Article 32(2).

Historical Context and Drafting

  • The roots of Article 226 can be traced back to the colonial era when British India faced a need for administrative justice.
  • This provision was drafted to ensure that High Courts could act as a check on the actions of the executive and administrative bodies.
  • Its inclusion in the Indian Constitution was a crucial step in ensuring that the legacy of justice continued in independent India.

Comparison with Article 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies)

  • Article 32 of the Indian Constitution also provides for remedies in case of fundamental rights violations.
  • However, Article 32 allows individuals to directly approach the Supreme Court of India, while Article 226 empowers the High Courts for similar purposes.
  • This distinction ensures that individuals can seek justice at the state level without going to the Supreme Court, making the legal system more accessible.

Key Features

Writ Jurisdiction

  • Article 226 primarily deals with writ jurisdiction.
  • Writs are legal remedies issued by the courts to enforce or protect rights.
  • The five main types of writs that can be issued under Article 226 are Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto.
  • Each writ serves a specific purpose and can be invoked based on the nature of the case.

High Court’s Powers

  • Article 226 empowers High Courts to not only issue writs but also to issue orders, directions, or any other form of legal remedy deemed necessary.
  • This wide discretion allows High Courts to adapt to the unique circumstances of each case.

Scope of Article 226

  • The scope of Article 226 is comprehensive.
  • It extends to not only enforcing fundamental rights but also to a wide range of legal rights.
  • High Courts can intervene in matters related to administrative actions, public interest litigations, environmental concerns, and much more.
  • This expansive scope makes Article 226 a versatile tool for justice.

Limitations on the High Court’s Powers

  • While Article 226 grants significant powers to the High Courts, it also imposes certain limitations.
  • High Courts cannot interfere in purely legislative or policy matters.
  • Additionally, they cannot issue writs against private individuals unless they are discharging a public function.
  • These limitations strike a balance between judicial oversight and the separation of powers.

Writs Issued Under Article 226

Habeas Corpus

  • Habeas Corpus is a writ that commands the release of a person who has been unlawfully detained.
  • It ensures that individuals are not deprived of their liberty without due process of law.


  • Mandamus is a writ issued to public officials or authorities to compel them to perform a legal duty or refrain from an illegal act.
  • It’s often used to enforce administrative accountability.


  • Prohibition is a writ that prevents lower courts or authorities from exceeding their jurisdiction or acting beyond their legal powers.


  • Certiorari is a writ that allows a higher court to review the decisions of lower courts or tribunals to ensure they are made within their legal authority.

Quo Warranto

  • Quo Warranto is a writ used to question the legality of a person holding a public office and to determine if they have the authority to do so.

Types of Cases Where Each Writ Is Applicable

  • Each writ has specific applicability.
  • Habeas Corpus is relevant in cases of unlawful detention, Mandamus in cases of administrative negligence, Prohibition in cases of exceeding jurisdiction, Certiorari in cases of erroneous legal decisions, and Quo Warranto in cases of unauthorized occupation of public office.

Landmark Cases

  1. In the landmark case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. the Union of India (1984), it was established that Article 226 of the Indian Constitution holds a broader scope than Article 32. This is because it empowers High Courts to issue orders, directions, and writs not only for the protection of fundamental rights but also for the enforcement of legal rights conferred by statutes, which are of equal importance. These legal rights are granted to disadvantaged individuals and carry significant weight.
  2. In the case of Veerappa Pillai v. Raman and Raman Limited (1952), it was clarified that Article 226 enables High Courts to issue writs when subordinate authorities act without jurisdiction, exceed their jurisdiction, violate principles of natural justice, refuse to exercise their vested jurisdiction, or when an evident error is apparent on the face of the record. Nevertheless, despite the broad jurisdiction, the High Court’s role does not extend to acting as an appellate authority to reevaluate contested decisions or determine the correct course of action.
  3. In Chandigarh Administration v. Manpreet Singh (1991), it was established that when functioning under Article 226, the High Court does not serve as an appellate body reviewing the actions of subordinate authorities. Instead, its authority is purely supervisory. The primary objective of this jurisdiction is to ensure that government entities, as well as other agencies and courts, operate within their defined jurisdictions. While carrying out this oversight, the High Court must stay within its own clearly defined boundaries.
  4. In the case of Burmah Construction Co. v. the State of Orissa (1961), it was determined that the High Court typically does not entertain petitions under Article 226 to enforce civil liabilities arising from torts or breaches of contract for the payment of dues. In such cases, the aggrieved party is usually directed to pursue the matter through a civil suit. However, in situations involving the enforcement of a statutory duty, an order for the payment of money may be issued through a petition under Article 226 against the state or a state officer.
  5. In Jagdish Prasad Shastri v. the State of Uttar Pradesh (1970), it was established that if a writ petition raises factual disputes that the High Court deems inappropriate for resolution through a high prerogative writ, the court has the authority to decline adjudicating such matters and direct the party seeking redress to pursue the usual litigation process. Dismissing a petition due to the presence of disputed factual issues is deemed lawful.
  6. In the case of State of Madras v. Sundaram (1964), it was clarified that when it is evident that the contested findings lack evidentiary support, the High Court, in exercising its authority under Article 226, cannot act as an appellate body reviewing the factual determinations made by a competent tribunal in a properly conducted departmental inquiry. In such cases, the adequacy of the evidence to support the allegations is not within the High Court’s purview.


Protection of Fundamental Rights

  • Article 226 serves as a safeguard for the fundamental rights of citizens.
  • It allows individuals to seek legal remedies when their rights are violated by the state or any other authority.

Safeguarding Against Administrative Excesses

  • It acts as a check on the powers of the executive and administrative bodies.
  • High Courts can intervene when there is an abuse of power or a violation of legal procedures.

Ensuring Justice and Fairness

  • Article 226 ensures that justice is accessible and swift.
  • It empowers High Courts to step in and correct legal wrongs promptly, preventing injustice.

Recent Developments

Amendments or Changes Related to Article 226

  • As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, there were no significant amendments to Article 226.
  • However, it’s essential to stay updated with any legislative changes that might have occurred since then.

Notable Judgments or Rulings

  • Keep an eye on recent judgments or rulings related to Article 226 as they can provide valuable insights into its evolving role in Indian jurisprudence.

Challenges and Controversies

Challenges Faced in the Implementation of Article 226

  • Some challenges include the delay in disposal of cases, the potential for misuse, and ensuring uniformity in the exercise of jurisdiction among different High Courts.

Controversial Cases or Issues Related to Its Interpretation

  • Controversies can arise over the interpretation of Article 226 and the extent of its applicability in specific cases.
  • It’s important for the legal fraternity and policymakers to address these controversies to ensure justice is served efficiently.


  • In conclusion, Article 226 of the Indian Constitution stands as a guardian of justice, ensuring that the rights and liberties of citizens are protected and upheld.
  • Its significance cannot be overstated, as it provides a mechanism for individuals to seek redress when their rights are violated.
  • High Courts across the country wield this powerful tool to maintain the rule of law, check administrative excesses, and ensure justice for all.
  • As India evolves, Article 226 will continue to be a cornerstone of its legal system, promoting fairness, equity, and the protection of rights.
Share this:

Leave a Comment